PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
4.76 - 4.81
3.91 - 4.81
500.5K / 774.6K (Avg.)
10.82 | 0.44
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.09%
Revenue decline while 0363.HK shows 60.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.07%
Cost reduction while 0363.HK shows 64.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-9.11%
Gross profit decline while 0363.HK shows 53.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-204.30%
G&A reduction while 0363.HK shows 60.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-8.92%
Marketing expense reduction while 0363.HK shows 230.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.26%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 0363.HK's 10.76%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.79%
Total costs reduction while 0363.HK shows 49.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.83%
Interest expense growth less than half of 0363.HK's 1.67%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.25%
D&A growth less than half of 0363.HK's 81.46%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-16.56%
EBITDA decline while 0363.HK shows 8682.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.21%
EBITDA margin decline while 0363.HK shows 5461.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.45%
Operating income decline while 0363.HK shows 914.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-63.10%
Operating margin decline while 0363.HK shows 608.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-533.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-78.89%
Pre-tax income decline while 0363.HK shows 30.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-76.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.53%
Tax expense reduction while 0363.HK shows 89.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-84.60%
Net income decline while 0363.HK shows 23.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.60%
EPS decline while 0363.HK shows 65.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.60%
Diluted EPS decline while 0363.HK shows 67.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.49%
Share count reduction while 0363.HK shows 6.28% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.49%
Diluted share reduction while 0363.HK shows 5.79% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.