Futong Technology Development Holdings Limited (0465.HK)

0.340.00 (0.00%)

Futong Technology Development Holdings Limited (0465.HK) stock comprehensive Forecast and Price Target with Analyst Ratings, Revenue Estimates, and complete financial and advanced discounted cashflow forecasts for up to 10 years.

High Bankruptcy RiskLow ProfitabilityModerate EfficiencyWeak GrowthLow QualityAdequate Dividend ProfileIndustry Rank: 37.14%Sector Rank: 47.24%

HKSE - Technology - Information Technology Services | Market Cap: 107.38M | Next Earnings Date: 25 Mar 2025

Day's Range

0.34 - 0.34

52-Week Range

0.23 - 0.41

Volume

110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)

P/E Ratio | EPS

-1.33 | -0.26

Trending:

Analyst Consensus

Compare with Competitor

None

View analysts' price targets and recommendations, and compare them with competitors.

Analyst Price Target

No Data

No price target data available for this metric.

Analyst Recommendation

Neutral consensus among analysts.

Financial Forecasts

Analyze analyst forecasts for the company and compare them with competitors.

No Data Available

No financial forecast data is currently available for 0465.HK. This could be because the stock is not widely covered by analysts or the data is temporarily unavailable.

Discounted Cash Flow Forecasts for 2026

Select Year

2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 2024

Compare with Competitor

None 0482.HK 0455.HK 0458.HK

Analyze DCF forecasts for the company and compare them with competitors.

Revenue

111.50M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's revenue of 5.74B.

Revenue Growth Rate

-17.53%

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's revenue growth rate of 17.11%.

EBITDA

-28.36M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's ebitda of 557.13M.

EBITDA Margin

-25.44%

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's ebitda margin of 9.71%.

EBIT

-33.58M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's ebit of 209.09M.

EBIT Margin

-30.11%

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's ebit margin of 3.64%.

Depreciation

5.21M

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's depreciation of 348.04M.

Total Cash

98.19M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's total cash of 670.53M.

Cash as Percentage of Revenue

88.06%

Higher than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's cash as percentage of revenue of 11.69%.

Receivables

22.51M

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's receivables of 737.36M.

Receivables as Percentage of Revenue

20.19%

Higher than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's receivables as percentage of revenue of 12.85%.

Inventories

5.88M

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's inventories of 1.09B.

Inventories as Percentage of Revenue

5.27%

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's inventories as percentage of revenue of 19.06%.

Accounts Payable

10.16M

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's accounts payable of 585.79M.

Payables as Percentage of Revenue

9.11%

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's payables as percentage of revenue of 10.21%.

Capital Expenditure

-2.78M

Higher than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's capital expenditure of -124.83M.

CapEx as Percentage of Revenue

-2.50%

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's capex as percentage of revenue of -2.18%.

Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)

7.54%

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's weighted average cost of capital (wacc) of 9.07%.

Cost of Equity

7.62%

Higher than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's cost of equity of 7.06%.

Cost of Debt

4.04%

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's cost of debt of 26.53%.

Beta

0.76

Higher than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's beta of 0.64.

Diluted Shares Outstanding

311.25M

Higher than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's diluted shares outstanding of 275.24M.

Total Debt

2.00M

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's total debt of 232.89M.

Total Equity

94.93M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's total equity of 688.10M.

Total Capital

96.93M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's total capital of 921.00M.

Debt Weighting

2.06%

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's debt weighting of 25.29%.

Equity Weighting

97.94%

Higher than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's equity weighting of 74.71%.

EBIAT

-28.73M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's ebiat of 118.29M.

Unlevered Free Cash Flow

-22.42M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's unlevered free cash flow of 159.53M.

Long-Term Growth Rate

2.00%

Equal to 0458.HK's long-term growth rate of 2.00%.

Terminal Value

-231.67M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's terminal value of 3.70B.

Enterprise Value

-255.20M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's enterprise value of 3.12B.

Net Debt

-217.79M

Higher than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's net debt of -223.03M.

Equity Value

-37.41M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's equity value of 3.34B.

Equity Value Per Share

-0.12

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's equity value per share of 12.14.

Select Metric for Chart

Discounted Cash Flow Forecasts for 2026

Select Year

2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 2024

Compare with Competitor

None 0482.HK 0455.HK 0458.HK

Analyze DCF forecasts for the company and compare them with competitors.

Revenue

111.50M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's revenue of 5.74B.

Revenue Growth Rate

-17.53%

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's revenue growth rate of 17.11%.

EBITDA

-28.36M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's ebitda of 557.13M.

EBITDA Margin

-25.44%

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's ebitda margin of 9.71%.

EBIT

-33.58M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's ebit of 209.09M.

EBIT Margin

-30.11%

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's ebit margin of 3.64%.

Depreciation

5.21M

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's depreciation of 348.04M.

Total Cash

98.19M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's total cash of 670.53M.

Cash as Percentage of Revenue

88.06%

Higher than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's cash as percentage of revenue of 11.69%.

Receivables

22.51M

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's receivables of 737.36M.

Receivables as Percentage of Revenue

20.19%

Higher than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's receivables as percentage of revenue of 12.85%.

Inventories

5.88M

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's inventories of 1.09B.

Inventories as Percentage of Revenue

5.27%

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's inventories as percentage of revenue of 19.06%.

Accounts Payable

10.16M

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's accounts payable of 585.79M.

Payables as Percentage of Revenue

9.11%

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's payables as percentage of revenue of 10.21%.

Capital Expenditure

-2.78M

Higher than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's capital expenditure of -124.83M.

CapEx as Percentage of Revenue

-2.50%

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's capex as percentage of revenue of -2.18%.

Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)

7.54%

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's weighted average cost of capital (wacc) of 9.07%.

Cost of Equity

7.62%

Higher than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's cost of equity of 7.06%.

Cost of Debt

4.04%

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's cost of debt of 26.53%.

Beta

0.76

Higher than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's beta of 0.64.

Diluted Shares Outstanding

311.25M

Higher than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's diluted shares outstanding of 275.24M.

Total Debt

2.00M

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's total debt of 232.89M.

Total Equity

94.93M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's total equity of 688.10M.

Total Capital

96.93M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's total capital of 921.00M.

Debt Weighting

2.06%

Lower than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's debt weighting of 25.29%.

Equity Weighting

97.94%

Higher than competitor

Better than 0458.HK's equity weighting of 74.71%.

EBIAT

-28.73M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's ebiat of 118.29M.

Unlevered Free Cash Flow

-22.42M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's unlevered free cash flow of 159.53M.

Long-Term Growth Rate

2.00%

Equal to 0458.HK's long-term growth rate of 2.00%.

Terminal Value

-231.67M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's terminal value of 3.70B.

Enterprise Value

-255.20M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's enterprise value of 3.12B.

Net Debt

-217.79M

Higher than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's net debt of -223.03M.

Equity Value

-37.41M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's equity value of 3.34B.

Equity Value Per Share

-0.12

Lower than competitor

Worse than 0458.HK's equity value per share of 12.14.

Select Metric for Chart