0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-81.01%
Cash & equivalents declining -81.01% while 8198.HK's grows 191.40%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-81.01%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x 8198.HK's -8.60%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
6193.74%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
28.40%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-77.23%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-4.58%
Below half of 8198.HK's 252.30%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-8.62%
Both 8198.HK and the company show zero PP&E (Net) Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.90%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.09%
Less than half of 8198.HK's 100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.82%
Below half of 8198.HK's 112.36%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.51%
Both 8198.HK and the company show zero Total Assets Growth.
-2.45%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
6.85%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-12.74%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.19%
Higher Total Current Liabilities Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.14%
Higher Total Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
6.14%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.19%
Higher Total Liabilities Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.55%
Higher Retained Earnings Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating better performance.
105.49%
Similar yoy to 8198.HK's 109.10%. Walter Schloss sees parallel comprehensive income changes.
0.07%
Less than half of 8198.HK's 78.02%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
1.01%
Below half 8198.HK's -6.30%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-4.51%
Below half 8198.HK's 148.06%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
7.09%
Below half 8198.HK's -100.00%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
6.85%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
165.28%
Less than half of 8198.HK's 647.99%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.