PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-51.22%
Cash & equivalents declining -51.22% while 8198.HK's grows 183.49%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
-10.21%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of 8198.HK's -141.85%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-41.13%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x 8198.HK's -16.51%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
84.92%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.29%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
64.91%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-14.82%
Below half of 8198.HK's 102.77%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-3.02%
Both 8198.HK and the company show zero PP&E (Net) Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2812.89%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2812.89%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-37.48%
Both 8198.HK and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-3.44%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.44%
Less than half of 8198.HK's 100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
163.91%
0.5-0.75x 8198.HK's 273.02%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
-91.44%
Higher Other Assets Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-10.95%
Both 8198.HK and the company show zero Total Assets Growth.
-15.65%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.37%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating better performance.
-27.21%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-24.50%
Higher Total Current Liabilities Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.80%
Higher Total Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.55%
Higher Total Liabilities Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.30%
Both 8198.HK and the company show zero Retained Earnings Growth.
14.84%
Less than half of 8198.HK's -77.43%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
0.50%
Less than half of 8198.HK's -158186.21%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
-7.01%
Below half 8198.HK's -19.61%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-10.95%
≥ 1.5x 8198.HK's -1.68%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-32.37%
Below half 8198.HK's -95.06%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-36.45%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to 8198.HK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
51.31%
Less than half of 8198.HK's -167.99%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.