0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-49.38%
Negative revenue growth while 0354.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-41.91%
Negative gross profit growth while 0354.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-44.61%
Negative EBIT growth while 0354.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-44.57%
Negative operating income growth while 0354.HK is at 112.75%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-31.13%
Negative net income growth while 0354.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-32.88%
Negative EPS growth while 0354.HK is at 41.60%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-32.88%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
2.69%
Share change of 2.69% while 0354.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
2.69%
Diluted share change of 2.69% while 0354.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.83%
Negative OCF growth while 0354.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-181.77%
Negative FCF growth while 0354.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-1.42%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 466.41%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-1.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 176.49%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-1.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 51.60%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-234.05%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 2898.43%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-234.05%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 298.79%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-234.05%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 22.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
34.13%
Below 50% of 0354.HK's 161.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
34.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0354.HK's 47.80%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
34.13%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.83%
We cut SG&A while 0354.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.