PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0354.HK's 12.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
100.00%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 0354.HK's 22.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
100.00%
Positive EBIT growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
100.00%
Positive operating income growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
100.00%
Positive net income growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.00%
Positive EPS growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
100.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-1.42%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 281.58%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-1.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 148.79%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-1.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 130.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-234.05%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 1583.84%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-234.05%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 133.97%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-234.05%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 762.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
34.13%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
34.13%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
34.13%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SG&A growth well above 0354.HK's 23.01%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.