PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth of 0.00% while 0354.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0354.HK's 284.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-0.16%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
0.23%
Net income growth of 0.23% while 0354.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
2.18%
Positive EPS growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2.18%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0354.HK's 663.16%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
97.16%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0354.HK's 146.34%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
97.16%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0354.HK's 130.34%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-368.11%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 3267.68%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-368.11%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 131.67%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-368.11%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 762.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
168.86%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
168.86%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
168.86%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A growth of 0.00% while 0354.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.