0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.59%
Revenue growth of 3.59% while 0354.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
10.77%
Gross profit growth of 10.77% while 0354.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
11.19%
EBIT growth of 11.19% while 0354.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
8.99%
Operating income growth under 50% of 0354.HK's 31.74%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
2.96%
Net income growth of 2.96% while 0354.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
3.05%
EPS growth under 50% of 0354.HK's 6.99%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
3.05%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0354.HK's 0.52%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.96%
Dividend reduction while 0354.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0354.HK's 1030.64%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
137.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to 0354.HK's 125.58%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
20.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0354.HK's 51.63%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-1635.22%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-1635.22%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-472.61%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
40.98%
Below 50% of 0354.HK's 351.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
40.98%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-47.56%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK is 163.58%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.92%
Below 50% of 0354.HK's 60.64%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.90%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
22.86%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0354.HK's 12.98%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.75%
50-75% of 0354.HK's 10.48%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
55.56%
Debt growth far above 0354.HK's 24.89%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.81%
SG&A growth of 15.81% while 0354.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.