PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.55%
Negative revenue growth while 0354.HK stands at 5.63%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-17.22%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-100.00%
Negative EBIT growth while 0354.HK is at 12.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-12.26%
Negative operating income growth while 0354.HK is at 12.05%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-37.60%
Negative net income growth while 0354.HK stands at 33.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-37.55%
Negative EPS growth while 0354.HK is at 31.05%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-37.55%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0354.HK is at 31.05%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0354.HK's 1.73%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.22%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-11.75%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-3.80%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 366.11%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-2.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 87.35%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
22.12%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0354.HK's 33.76%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
203.81%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
326.63%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-53.63%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-48.49%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 120.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-61.60%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is 185.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-56.09%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK is 41.83%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0354.HK's 38.72%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0354.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-21.47%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0354.HK shows 23.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-26.73%
Inventory is declining while 0354.HK stands at 23.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-11.35%
Negative asset growth while 0354.HK invests at 1.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.36%
Under 50% of 0354.HK's 2.93%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
15.30%
Debt growth far above 0354.HK's 2.98%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.60%
We cut SG&A while 0354.HK invests at 1.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.