PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-34.77%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-21.03%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.81%
Negative operating income growth while 0354.HK is at 16.76%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
16.51%
Net income growth under 50% of 0354.HK's 41.41%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
16.56%
EPS growth at 50-75% of 0354.HK's 29.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
16.56%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of 0354.HK's 29.54%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 0354.HK is at 9.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.43%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-22.18%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-32.72%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 338.48%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-13.73%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 52.55%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-41.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 42.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
332.45%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
15.73%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
156.34%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-25.84%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 127.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-34.73%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is 455.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
8.33%
Below 50% of 0354.HK's 73.44%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.38%
Below 50% of 0354.HK's 92.71%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
19.50%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0354.HK's 38.96%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.66%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0354.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-21.05%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0354.HK shows 26.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
17.16%
Inventory growth well above 0354.HK's 26.67%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-21.04%
Negative asset growth while 0354.HK invests at 11.26%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.20%
Under 50% of 0354.HK's 10.02%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-38.98%
We’re deleveraging while 0354.HK stands at 6.70%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.61%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.