PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
44.45%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0354.HK's 14.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-4.36%
Negative gross profit growth while 0354.HK is at 24.91%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.34%
Negative operating income growth while 0354.HK is at 4.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-93.02%
Negative net income growth while 0354.HK stands at 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-92.97%
Negative EPS growth while 0354.HK is at 1.94%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-92.97%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.02%
Slight or no buybacks while 0354.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.87%
Dividend reduction while 0354.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
168.26%
OCF growth at 50-75% of 0354.HK's 255.04%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
178.21%
FCF growth similar to 0354.HK's 197.28%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
94.34%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0354.HK's 398.05%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
24.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0354.HK's 77.43%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-18.27%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 60.81%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
2219.76%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0354.HK's 1047.12%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
254.07%
Below 50% of 0354.HK's 1894.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
251.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0354.HK's 1615.56%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-89.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 126.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-95.51%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is 462.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-92.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK is 71.22%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.64%
Below 50% of 0354.HK's 62.40%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
13.11%
Below 50% of 0354.HK's 36.82%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.57%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-10.21%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
13.59%
We show growth while 0354.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
10.10%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x 0354.HK's 6.76%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
0.18%
Under 50% of 0354.HK's 8.94%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
1.47%
Debt shrinking faster vs. 0354.HK's 3.37%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.99%
We expand SG&A while 0354.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.