PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.85%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of 0354.HK's 35.13%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
-13.84%
Negative gross profit growth while 0354.HK is at 51.15%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.70%
Negative operating income growth while 0354.HK is at 18.29%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-108.82%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-109.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-109.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-7.24%
Share reduction while 0354.HK is at 0.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-7.18%
Reduced diluted shares while 0354.HK is at 5.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-97.47%
Dividend reduction while 0354.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
79.71%
OCF growth under 50% of 0354.HK's 252.00%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
78.76%
FCF growth under 50% of 0354.HK's 197.84%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
150.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0354.HK's 632.62%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
59.04%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0354.HK's 127.08%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-9.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 76.28%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-484.78%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 7563.62%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-129.36%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 823.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-156.22%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 195.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-111.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 315.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-105.00%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is 143.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-107.21%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK is 124.67%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.20%
Below 50% of 0354.HK's 61.48%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
13.06%
Below 50% of 0354.HK's 55.93%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.50%
We show growth while 0354.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
27.12%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0354.HK's 6.74%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
7.42%
Under 50% of 0354.HK's 15.59%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
55.15%
We have some new debt while 0354.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.41%
SG&A growth well above 0354.HK's 2.94%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.