PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.81%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0354.HK's 23.00%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-11.22%
Negative gross profit growth while 0354.HK is at 40.70%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.45%
Negative operating income growth while 0354.HK is at 11.56%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-6681.17%
Negative net income growth while 0354.HK stands at 30.40%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-6600.00%
Negative EPS growth while 0354.HK is at 30.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-6600.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0354.HK is at 22.57%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
2.11%
Share count expansion well above 0354.HK's 3.79%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
2.11%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 0354.HK's 8.96%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
274.27%
Similar OCF growth to 0354.HK's 253.73%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
269.63%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x 0354.HK's 227.82%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
133.95%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0354.HK's 454.42%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-1.61%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 145.77%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
13.41%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0354.HK's 56.09%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
3556.46%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0354.HK's 578.27%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
338.17%
Below 50% of 0354.HK's 1717.72%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
236.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0354.HK's 44.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-368.92%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 130.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-290.75%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is 220.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-311.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK is 147.20%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.17%
Below 50% of 0354.HK's 78.80%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-4.71%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0354.HK is at 57.78%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0354.HK shows 4.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-11.06%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-17.72%
Negative asset growth while 0354.HK invests at 12.78%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-8.94%
We have a declining book value while 0354.HK shows 5.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-31.50%
We’re deleveraging while 0354.HK stands at 6.69%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.96%
We expand SG&A while 0354.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.