PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-37.92%
Negative revenue growth while 0354.HK stands at 19.89%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-32.44%
Negative gross profit growth while 0354.HK is at 33.42%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.12%
Positive operating income growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.82%
Positive net income growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
8.00%
EPS growth of 8.00% while 0354.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
8.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 8.00% while 0354.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
1.70%
Share count expansion well above 0354.HK's 0.31%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.70%
Slight or no buyback while 0354.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.28%
OCF growth under 50% of 0354.HK's 218.55%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
99.97%
FCF growth under 50% of 0354.HK's 201.23%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-11.98%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 452.66%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-68.68%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 127.33%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-55.35%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 68.22%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
2680.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0354.HK's 950.47%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
405.48%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0354.HK's 211.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
49.13%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0354.HK's 12.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-49.61%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 430.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-59.07%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is 239.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
552.73%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0354.HK's 103.15%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.59%
Below 50% of 0354.HK's 90.08%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-4.84%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0354.HK is at 46.78%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0354.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-42.29%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-58.41%
Inventory is declining while 0354.HK stands at 80.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-8.31%
Negative asset growth while 0354.HK invests at 17.21%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.18%
Under 50% of 0354.HK's 6.61%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-78.21%
We’re deleveraging while 0354.HK stands at 39.82%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.73%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.