Futong Technology Development Holdings Limited (0465.HK)

Negative revenue growth while 0354.HK stands at 17.43%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while 0354.HK is at 28.70%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Negative net income growth while 0354.HK stands at 8.13%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while 0354.HK is at 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while 0354.HK is at 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.

OCF growth at 50-75% of 0354.HK's 329.43%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.

FCF growth 75-90% of 0354.HK's 308.67%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 377.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 100.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 50.15%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0354.HK's 1154.45%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.

Below 50% of 0354.HK's 104.30%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 350.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is 204.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK is 71.48%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

Below 50% of 0354.HK's 261.26%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0354.HK is at 98.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0354.HK is at 36.51%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative near-term dividend growth while 0354.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

We have a declining book value while 0354.HK shows 3.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.