PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-43.71%
Negative revenue growth while 0354.HK stands at 32.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.71%
Negative gross profit growth while 0354.HK is at 49.76%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.48%
Negative operating income growth while 0354.HK is at 24.80%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-106.29%
Negative net income growth while 0354.HK stands at 37.91%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-105.88%
Negative EPS growth while 0354.HK is at 25.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-105.88%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0354.HK is at 26.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0354.HK's 9.52%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
325.75%
OCF growth at 50-75% of 0354.HK's 541.89%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
335.95%
FCF growth 50-75% of 0354.HK's 489.76%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
-81.71%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 282.59%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-85.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 115.64%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-87.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 41.09%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
7.81%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0354.HK's 2886.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-69.55%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 49.71%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-80.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 40.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-100.58%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 1150.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-112.88%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is 189.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
99.50%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0354.HK's 54.69%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
25.56%
Below 50% of 0354.HK's 221.67%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-3.89%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0354.HK is at 98.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
3.36%
Below 50% of 0354.HK's 51.57%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0354.HK shows 6.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
49.39%
We show growth while 0354.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.11%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0354.HK's 11.45%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.07%
We have a declining book value while 0354.HK shows 11.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
8.77%
We have some new debt while 0354.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.31%
We expand SG&A while 0354.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.