PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
139.63%
Positive revenue growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-6.61%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.23%
Operating income growth similar to 0354.HK's 28.22%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
33.87%
Positive net income growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
31.25%
Positive EPS growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
31.25%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0354.HK's 1.61%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.39%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-116.54%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-87.78%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 307.93%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-88.16%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 90.55%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-60.23%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 50.11%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
13.79%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
38.22%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-49.02%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-264.27%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 383.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-5490.50%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is 83.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-473.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK is 30.68%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-7.01%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 0354.HK stands at 277.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-24.07%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0354.HK is at 101.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-19.64%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0354.HK is at 56.46%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0354.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 164.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0354.HK invests at 45.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
84.92%
AR growth well above 0354.HK's 17.29%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-0.29%
Inventory is declining while 0354.HK stands at 5.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-10.95%
Negative asset growth while 0354.HK invests at 3.61%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-6.95%
We have a declining book value while 0354.HK shows 2.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-36.45%
We’re deleveraging while 0354.HK stands at 26.99%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-22.46%
We cut SG&A while 0354.HK invests at 105.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.