PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-42.78%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
77.20%
Positive gross profit growth while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.94%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-25.15%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-18.18%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.88%
OCF growth under 50% of 0354.HK's 295.77%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
123.76%
FCF growth under 50% of 0354.HK's 271.14%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-93.25%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 305.44%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-93.14%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 64.97%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-58.39%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 28.73%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
120.58%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0354.HK's 2343.49%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-91.36%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 38.68%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-73.60%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-299.67%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 58.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-4.68%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-585.45%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-20.51%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 0354.HK stands at 253.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-24.42%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0354.HK is at 97.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-26.46%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0354.HK is at 57.07%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.78%
Our AR growth while 0354.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-90.78%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-9.38%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-9.37%
We have a declining book value while 0354.HK shows 3.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
129.55%
We have some new debt while 0354.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.40%
We expand SG&A while 0354.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.