PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
24.72%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0354.HK's 13.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-76.02%
Negative gross profit growth while 0354.HK is at 4.30%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-56.61%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-38.79%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-32.02%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-32.52%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-32.52%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while 0354.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Similar OCF growth to 0354.HK's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
100.00%
FCF growth similar to 0354.HK's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
-94.79%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 164.74%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-72.16%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 32.35%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-8.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0354.HK stands at 3.48%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
100.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-312.21%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0354.HK is at 66.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-557.81%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
20.57%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0354.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-55.77%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 0354.HK stands at 234.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-54.84%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0354.HK is at 68.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-48.30%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0354.HK is at 13.45%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.48%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.61%
Negative asset growth while 0354.HK invests at 7.12%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-13.92%
We have a declining book value while 0354.HK shows 4.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-34.53%
We’re deleveraging while 0354.HK stands at 20.47%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
97.32%
R&D growth of 97.32% while 0354.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
3.37%
We expand SG&A while 0354.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.