PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Revenue growth of 100.00% while 0455.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
100.00%
Gross profit growth of 100.00% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
100.00%
EBIT growth of 100.00% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
100.00%
Operating income growth of 100.00% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
100.00%
Net income growth of 100.00% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
100.00%
EPS growth of 100.00% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 100.00% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-1.42%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 108.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-1.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 413.17%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-1.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 103.01%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-234.05%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 239.07%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-234.05%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK is at 215.05%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-234.05%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 943.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
34.13%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
34.13%
Below 50% of 0455.HK's 124.92%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
34.13%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SG&A growth of 100.00% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.