PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth of 0.00% while 0455.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
EBIT growth of 0.00% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
-0.16%
Negative operating income growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.23%
Net income growth of 0.23% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
2.18%
EPS growth of 2.18% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
2.18%
Diluted EPS growth of 2.18% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0455.HK's 203.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
97.16%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0455.HK's 344.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
97.16%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0455.HK's 125.00%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
-368.11%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 526.49%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-368.11%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK is at 1673.52%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-368.11%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 718.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
168.86%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0455.HK's 26.62% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
168.86%
Below 50% of 0455.HK's 1864.77%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
168.86%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0455.HK's 131.11%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A growth of 0.00% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.