PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
45.70%
Positive revenue growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.76%
Positive gross profit growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-15.72%
Negative EBIT growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-16.63%
Negative operating income growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-42.49%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-44.22%
Negative EPS growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-44.22%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-217.16%
Negative OCF growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-226.66%
Negative FCF growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
14.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0455.HK's 214.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
14.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0455.HK's 82.53%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
16.42%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to 0455.HK's 18.19%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
-867.61%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 2205.40%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-867.61%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK is at 1929.83%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-472.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 660.51%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-31.54%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0455.HK is at 13.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-31.54%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0455.HK is 116.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-48.96%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0455.HK is 306.68%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.78%
Inventory growth of 33.78% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-9.23%
Negative asset growth while 0455.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.63%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
7.68%
Debt growth of 7.68% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.84%
We expand SG&A while 0455.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.