0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.59%
Revenue growth of 3.59% while 0455.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
10.77%
Gross profit growth of 10.77% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
11.19%
Positive EBIT growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.99%
Positive operating income growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2.96%
Net income growth of 2.96% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
3.05%
EPS growth of 3.05% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
3.05%
Diluted EPS growth of 3.05% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.96%
Dividend reduction while 0455.HK stands at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0455.HK's 1521.18%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
137.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0455.HK's 211.07%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
20.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0455.HK's 36.14%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-1635.22%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 714.50%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-1635.22%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK is at 296.86%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-472.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 65.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
40.98%
Below 50% of 0455.HK's 243.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
40.98%
Below 50% of 0455.HK's 111.68%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-47.56%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.92%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.90%
Inventory is declining while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
22.86%
Positive asset growth while 0455.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.75%
Positive BV/share change while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
55.56%
Debt growth of 55.56% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.81%
SG&A growth of 15.81% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.