PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.51%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-16.00%
Negative gross profit growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-31.58%
Negative EBIT growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-25.81%
Negative operating income growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-16.73%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-16.72%
Negative EPS growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-16.72%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while 0455.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.69%
Dividend reduction while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-100.83%
Negative OCF growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-98.73%
Negative FCF growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-0.74%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 1684.77%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-0.74%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 242.46%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
27.28%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0455.HK's 49.88%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-1641.60%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 434.78%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-1641.60%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK is at 116.21%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-512.57%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-41.30%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0455.HK is at 271.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-41.30%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0455.HK is 113.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-48.34%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.67%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6193.74%
AR growth of 6193.74% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
28.40%
Inventory growth of 28.40% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-4.51%
Negative asset growth while 0455.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.85%
Positive BV/share change while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
6.85%
Debt growth of 6.85% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.92%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.