PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.55%
Revenue growth of 39.55% while 0455.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
38.08%
Gross profit growth of 38.08% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
22.49%
EBIT growth of 22.49% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
49.28%
Operating income growth of 49.28% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
40.65%
Net income growth of 40.65% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
40.50%
EPS growth of 40.50% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
40.50%
Diluted EPS growth of 40.50% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
122.20%
OCF growth of 122.20% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
121.23%
FCF growth of 121.23% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
177.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0455.HK's 1007.17%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
181.02%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0455.HK's 115.75%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
77.62%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
584.39%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0455.HK's 308.03%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
610.53%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0455.HK's 80.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
4.46%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
65.11%
Below 50% of 0455.HK's 156.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
23.10%
Below 50% of 0455.HK's 127.13%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-28.36%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.38%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.78%
AR growth of 30.78% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-24.78%
Inventory is declining while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
17.30%
Asset growth of 17.30% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
4.98%
Positive BV/share change while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
32.21%
Debt growth of 32.21% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.03%
SG&A growth of 36.03% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.