0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.55%
Negative revenue growth while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-17.22%
Negative gross profit growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-100.00%
Negative EBIT growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-12.26%
Negative operating income growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-37.60%
Negative net income growth while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-37.55%
Negative EPS growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-37.55%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while 0455.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.22%
Negative OCF growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.75%
Negative FCF growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-3.80%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 498.89%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-2.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 16.70%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
22.12%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0455.HK's 28.69%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
203.81%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
326.63%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-53.63%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-48.49%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0455.HK is at 19.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-61.60%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-56.09%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0455.HK's 8.58%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-21.47%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0455.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-26.73%
Inventory is declining while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-11.35%
Negative asset growth while 0455.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.36%
Positive BV/share change while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
15.30%
Debt growth of 15.30% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.60%
We cut SG&A while 0455.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.