PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.22%
Revenue growth of 7.22% while 0455.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
9.63%
Gross profit growth of 9.63% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.96%
Negative operating income growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
23.57%
Net income growth of 23.57% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
23.48%
EPS growth of 23.48% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
23.48%
Diluted EPS growth of 23.48% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while 0455.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
78.89%
OCF growth of 78.89% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
83.21%
FCF growth of 83.21% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
106.29%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0455.HK's 290.96%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
4.63%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
30.94%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0455.HK's 49.86%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
987.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
505.43%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-17.04%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
27.31%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-52.65%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-46.52%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.39%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
15.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0455.HK's 3.73%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.16%
AR growth of 10.16% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-24.05%
Inventory is declining while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.85%
Negative asset growth while 0455.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.70%
Positive BV/share change while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-17.96%
We’re deleveraging while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.16%
SG&A growth of 22.16% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.