PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.76%
Negative revenue growth while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
2.97%
Gross profit growth of 2.97% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.06%
Positive operating income growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
136.02%
Net income growth of 136.02% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
135.09%
EPS growth of 135.09% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
135.09%
Diluted EPS growth of 135.09% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
2.81%
Share change of 2.81% while 0455.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
2.75%
Diluted share change of 2.75% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
2829.79%
Dividend growth of 2829.79% while 0455.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-472.46%
Negative OCF growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-449.59%
Negative FCF growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
18.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0455.HK's 197.93%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
3.24%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0455.HK's 63.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
23.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0455.HK's 65.30%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-1171.24%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 517.40%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-39.56%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-452.60%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 317.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-97.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0455.HK is at 103.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-96.95%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-95.95%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0455.HK is 125.65%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.47%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
8.51%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.69%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 3.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-57.17%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0455.HK invests at 102.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
0.99%
AR growth of 0.99% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-19.74%
Inventory is declining while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-7.06%
Negative asset growth while 0455.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-3.52%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
17.00%
Debt growth of 17.00% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while 0455.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-16.72%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.