PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-37.92%
Negative revenue growth while 0455.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-32.44%
Negative gross profit growth while 0455.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.12%
Operating income growth under 50% of 0455.HK's 693.48%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
9.82%
Net income growth under 50% of 0455.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
8.00%
EPS growth of 8.00% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
8.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 8.00% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
1.70%
Slight or no buybacks while 0455.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.70%
Slight or no buyback while 0455.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.28%
OCF growth under 50% of 0455.HK's 510.02%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
99.97%
Positive FCF growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-11.98%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 697.70%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-68.68%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 269.73%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-55.35%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 478.81%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
2680.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
405.48%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
49.13%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0455.HK's 238.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-49.61%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-59.07%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
552.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.59%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-4.84%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0455.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-42.29%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0455.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-58.41%
Inventory is declining while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-8.31%
Negative asset growth while 0455.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.18%
Positive BV/share change while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-78.21%
We’re deleveraging while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.73%
We cut SG&A while 0455.HK invests at 100.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.