PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-45.31%
Negative revenue growth while 0455.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-27.69%
Negative gross profit growth while 0455.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-176.24%
Negative operating income growth while 0455.HK is at 196.40%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-168.14%
Negative net income growth while 0455.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-168.17%
Negative EPS growth while 0455.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-168.17%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0455.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0455.HK stands at 2638.57%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
234.80%
Positive OCF growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
234.11%
Positive FCF growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-80.43%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 380.72%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-81.30%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 447.06%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-84.60%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 351.25%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
546.56%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
10.14%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
411.16%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-115.27%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-132.26%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0455.HK is 110.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-244.87%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0455.HK is 17.32%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
9.09%
Positive growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-2.06%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-9.76%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0455.HK invests at 946.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-46.13%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0455.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-59.01%
Inventory is declining while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-7.50%
Negative asset growth while 0455.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.06%
We have a declining book value while 0455.HK shows 0.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-5.22%
We’re deleveraging while 0455.HK stands at 20.72%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.73%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0455.HK's 100.00%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.