PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.40%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0455.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-10.09%
Negative gross profit growth while 0455.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
138.46%
Positive operating income growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
151.67%
Positive net income growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
151.78%
Positive EPS growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
151.78%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.01%
Slight or no buybacks while 0455.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.14%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-86.89%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-67.50%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 292.93%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-62.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 231.77%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-78.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 196.75%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-77.79%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-80.81%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
107.75%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-90.66%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-85.69%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
408.55%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
35.33%
Positive growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-3.60%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-5.94%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 104.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
7.33%
AR growth of 7.33% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-41.82%
Inventory is declining while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.13%
Asset growth of 3.13% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
0.62%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0455.HK's 0.01%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-65.57%
We’re deleveraging while 0455.HK stands at 5.24%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while 0455.HK invests at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-26.11%
We cut SG&A while 0455.HK invests at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.