PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-43.71%
Negative revenue growth while 0455.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.71%
Negative gross profit growth while 0455.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.48%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-106.29%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-105.88%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-105.88%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.05%
Slight or no buybacks while 0455.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
325.75%
Positive OCF growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
335.95%
Positive FCF growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-81.71%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 302.33%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-85.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 536.20%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-87.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 22.11%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
7.81%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-69.55%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-80.68%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-100.58%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-112.88%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
99.50%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
25.56%
Positive growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-3.89%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
3.36%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0455.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
49.39%
Inventory growth well above 0455.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.11%
Asset growth of 1.11% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-0.07%
We have a declining book value while 0455.HK shows 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
8.77%
Debt growth far above 0455.HK's 2.96%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.31%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0455.HK's 100.00%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.