PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-42.78%
Negative revenue growth while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
77.20%
Gross profit growth of 77.20% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.94%
Negative operating income growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-25.15%
Negative net income growth while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-18.18%
Negative EPS growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-18.18%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 0455.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.88%
OCF growth of 123.88% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
123.76%
FCF growth of 123.76% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-93.25%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 133.57%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-93.14%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-58.39%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
120.58%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0455.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-91.36%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-73.60%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0455.HK stands at 42.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-299.67%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-4.68%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-585.45%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-20.51%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-24.42%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-26.46%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0455.HK stands at 248.43%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.78%
AR growth of 7.78% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-90.78%
Inventory is declining while 0455.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-9.38%
Negative asset growth while 0455.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-9.37%
We have a declining book value while 0455.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
129.55%
Debt growth of 129.55% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.40%
SG&A growth of 18.40% while 0455.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.