Futong Technology Development Holdings Limited (0465.HK)

Negative gross profit growth while 0458.HK is at 15.79%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Negative EBIT growth while 0458.HK is at 90.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Negative operating income growth while 0458.HK is at 42.92%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Negative net income growth while 0458.HK stands at 49.50%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 47.83%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 47.83%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

OCF growth under 50% of 0458.HK's 360.06%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.

Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 31.36%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 23.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 33.95%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0458.HK is at 96.29%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0458.HK's 122.73%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0458.HK is 2528.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Below 50% of 0458.HK's 68.67%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.

Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0458.HK is at 6.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0458.HK is at 18.13%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

We have a declining book value while 0458.HK shows 5.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.

Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.

R&D growth of 97.32% while 0458.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.

SG&A growth well above 0458.HK's 5.51%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.