PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.56%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of 0458.HK's 7.30%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
14.43%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0458.HK's 373.06%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
17.23%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0458.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
17.88%
Operating income growth under 50% of 0458.HK's 363.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
13.85%
Net income growth under 50% of 0458.HK's 289.49%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-17.05%
Negative EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 283.11%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-17.05%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 283.11%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
34.70%
Share count expansion well above 0458.HK's 0.10%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
34.70%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0458.HK's 0.10%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
475.46%
Positive OCF growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
426.01%
Positive FCF growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-22.02%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 21.91%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-22.02%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 13.80%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-22.02%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 5.10%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
273.65%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0458.HK's 386.24%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
273.65%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 17.38%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
273.65%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 61.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
13.62%
Below 50% of 0458.HK's 317.84%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
13.62%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0458.HK's 18.01%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
13.62%
Below 50% of 0458.HK's 50.07%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.22%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0458.HK shows 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
7.40%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 0458.HK's 17.34%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-2.31%
Negative asset growth while 0458.HK invests at 4.34%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-18.91%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.55%
SG&A growth well above 0458.HK's 15.18%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.