PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth of 0.00% while 0458.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
0.00%
Gross profit growth of 0.00% while 0458.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
3.16%
EBIT growth of 3.16% while 0458.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
-2.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1.42%
Net income growth of 1.42% while 0458.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
1.83%
EPS growth at 50-75% of 0458.HK's 2.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
1.83%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of 0458.HK's 2.78%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.33%
Negative OCF growth while 0458.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.95%
Negative FCF growth while 0458.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
55.97%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0458.HK's 144.06%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
55.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 13.86%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
55.97%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 4.18%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
555.17%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0458.HK's 873.47%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
555.17%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 17.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
555.17%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 60.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
130.48%
Below 50% of 0458.HK's 536.12%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
130.48%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 18.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
130.48%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 48.76%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0458.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-50.69%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.63%
Negative asset growth while 0458.HK invests at 4.04%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
9.95%
50-75% of 0458.HK's 18.05%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
21.88%
We have some new debt while 0458.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A growth of 0.00% while 0458.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.