0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.75%
Positive operating income growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1.47%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0458.HK's 0.02%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
4.63%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0458.HK's 2.17%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
4.63%
Diluted EPS growth of 4.63% while 0458.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0458.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.54%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0458.HK's 162.56%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
57.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 13.18%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
59.81%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1210.34%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with 0458.HK's 1144.99%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
1210.34%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0458.HK's 895.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
1077.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 43.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
138.06%
Below 50% of 0458.HK's 652.36%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
138.06%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 90.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
77.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 0458.HK's 142.97%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0458.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
42.68%
Inventory growth well above 0458.HK's 17.74%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
35.24%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0458.HK's 14.73%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
10.05%
Similar to 0458.HK's 9.91%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
9.48%
We have some new debt while 0458.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.