PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
44.45%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0458.HK's 7.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-4.36%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.34%
Negative operating income growth while 0458.HK is at 201.07%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-93.02%
Negative net income growth while 0458.HK stands at 147.60%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-92.97%
Negative EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 146.87%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-92.97%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 146.87%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.02%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0458.HK's 2.22%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.87%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
168.26%
OCF growth at 50-75% of 0458.HK's 251.30%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
178.21%
FCF growth 50-75% of 0458.HK's 241.41%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
94.34%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
24.60%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-18.27%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
2219.76%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 295.02%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
254.07%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to 0458.HK's 236.36%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
251.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0458.HK's 4013.77%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-89.65%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-95.51%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-92.66%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.64%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 13.18%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
13.11%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.57%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-10.21%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
13.59%
We show growth while 0458.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
10.10%
Positive asset growth while 0458.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.18%
Positive BV/share change while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
1.47%
We have some new debt while 0458.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.99%
We expand SG&A while 0458.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.