PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.52%
Positive revenue growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
16.18%
Positive gross profit growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.72%
Positive operating income growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1154.17%
Positive net income growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1100.00%
Positive EPS growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1100.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.74%
Slight or no buybacks while 0458.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
3.76%
Slight or no buyback while 0458.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
2215.96%
Dividend growth of 2215.96% while 0458.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-178.65%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-180.23%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-3.04%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
23.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-2.31%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-979.39%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-234.22%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
42.96%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-37.41%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-46.65%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
6.63%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.42%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 2.24%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
10.30%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.73%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-43.17%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0458.HK shows 3.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.99%
Inventory is declining while 0458.HK stands at 68.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-4.21%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-1.59%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-16.02%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while 0458.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-14.33%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.