PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.85%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0458.HK's 49.31%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-13.84%
Negative gross profit growth while 0458.HK is at 71.94%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.70%
Negative operating income growth while 0458.HK is at 154.11%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-108.82%
Negative net income growth while 0458.HK stands at 119.08%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-109.50%
Negative EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 118.42%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-109.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 119.21%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-7.24%
Share reduction while 0458.HK is at 4.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-7.18%
Reduced diluted shares while 0458.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-97.47%
Dividend reduction while 0458.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
79.71%
OCF growth under 50% of 0458.HK's 213.34%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
78.76%
FCF growth under 50% of 0458.HK's 201.16%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
150.56%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
59.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-9.55%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-484.78%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 1683.89%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-129.36%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0458.HK is at 79.23%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-156.22%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-111.91%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-105.00%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-107.21%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.20%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
13.06%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.50%
We show growth while 0458.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
27.12%
Positive asset growth while 0458.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
7.42%
Positive BV/share change while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
55.15%
We have some new debt while 0458.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.41%
SG&A growth well above 0458.HK's 4.51%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.