PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.81%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0458.HK's 58.91%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-11.22%
Negative gross profit growth while 0458.HK is at 77.79%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.45%
Negative operating income growth while 0458.HK is at 111.60%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-6681.17%
Negative net income growth while 0458.HK stands at 113.99%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-6600.00%
Negative EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 111.11%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-6600.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 114.22%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
2.11%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0458.HK's 28.07%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
2.11%
Diluted share change of 2.11% while 0458.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0458.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
274.27%
OCF growth at 75-90% of 0458.HK's 315.99%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
269.63%
FCF growth similar to 0458.HK's 271.57%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
133.95%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-1.61%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
13.41%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
3556.46%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 99.44%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
338.17%
Below 50% of 0458.HK's 1549.21%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
236.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-368.92%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-290.75%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-311.24%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.17%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-4.71%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0458.HK shows 5.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-11.06%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-17.72%
Negative asset growth while 0458.HK invests at 1.26%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-8.94%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-31.50%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.96%
SG&A growth well above 0458.HK's 15.85%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.