PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-40.37%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
4.11%
Positive gross profit growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
331.61%
Positive operating income growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
122.84%
Positive net income growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
123.08%
Positive EPS growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
123.08%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.87%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.87%
Reduced diluted shares while 0458.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.62%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-52.45%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-28.92%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-28.39%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
5.64%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
782.75%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
157.26%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
104.13%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-68.71%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-46.68%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-57.80%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0458.HK is 3.54%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.34%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-4.80%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-37.69%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0458.HK shows 32.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-50.48%
Inventory is declining while 0458.HK stands at 117.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-41.20%
Negative asset growth while 0458.HK invests at 27.45%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.14%
Under 50% of 0458.HK's 18.47%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-70.86%
We’re deleveraging while 0458.HK stands at 82.11%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while 0458.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-33.26%
We cut SG&A while 0458.HK invests at 7.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.