0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-45.31%
Negative revenue growth while 0458.HK stands at 30.09%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-27.69%
Negative gross profit growth while 0458.HK is at 28.40%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-176.24%
Negative operating income growth while 0458.HK is at 213.03%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-168.14%
Negative net income growth while 0458.HK stands at 89.15%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-168.17%
Negative EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 89.23%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-168.17%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 89.23%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 0458.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0458.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
234.80%
OCF growth at 75-90% of 0458.HK's 277.52%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
234.11%
FCF growth similar to 0458.HK's 218.52%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
-80.43%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 18.70%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-81.30%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-84.60%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 31.09%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
546.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 139.84%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
10.14%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
411.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0458.HK's 4.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-115.27%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0458.HK is at 92.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-132.26%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-244.87%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
9.09%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0458.HK's 7.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
-2.06%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-9.76%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0458.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-46.13%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0458.HK shows 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-59.01%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-7.50%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-1.06%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-5.22%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.73%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0458.HK's 13.86%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.