PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.40%
Positive revenue growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-10.09%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
138.46%
Positive operating income growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
151.67%
Positive net income growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
151.78%
Positive EPS growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
151.78%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.01%
Share change of 0.01% while 0458.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.14%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-86.89%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-67.50%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-62.33%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-78.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 20.16%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-77.79%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-80.81%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0458.HK is at 99.81%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
107.75%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to 0458.HK's 99.42%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-90.66%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-85.69%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
408.55%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
35.33%
Positive growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-3.60%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-5.94%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0458.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
7.33%
Our AR growth while 0458.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-41.82%
Inventory is declining while 0458.HK stands at 19.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.13%
Positive asset growth while 0458.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.62%
Positive BV/share change while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-65.57%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while 0458.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-26.11%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.