PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-43.71%
Negative revenue growth while 0458.HK stands at 55.19%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.71%
Negative gross profit growth while 0458.HK is at 94.31%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.48%
Negative operating income growth while 0458.HK is at 114.08%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-106.29%
Negative net income growth while 0458.HK stands at 75.04%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-105.88%
Negative EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 76.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-105.88%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 76.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.05%
Share change of 0.05% while 0458.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
325.75%
OCF growth under 50% of 0458.HK's 43288.48%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
335.95%
FCF growth under 50% of 0458.HK's 1123.70%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-81.71%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-85.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 8.46%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-87.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 50.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
7.81%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0458.HK's 84.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-69.55%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-80.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 48.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-100.58%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-112.88%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
99.50%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
25.56%
Positive growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-3.89%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
3.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0458.HK's 2.37%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0458.HK shows 17.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
49.39%
We show growth while 0458.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.11%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0458.HK's 4.68%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.07%
We have a declining book value while 0458.HK shows 5.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
8.77%
Debt growth far above 0458.HK's 2.42%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.31%
SG&A growth well above 0458.HK's 27.49%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.