Futong Technology Development Holdings Limited (0465.HK)

Negative revenue growth while 0458.HK stands at 46.96%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while 0458.HK is at 43.03%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative operating income growth while 0458.HK is at 4245.02%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Negative net income growth while 0458.HK stands at 262.92%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 266.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while 0458.HK is at 266.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Share reduction while 0458.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative OCF growth while 0458.HK is at 608.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while 0458.HK is at 424.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 9.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 39.65%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 55.46%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 65.60%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 57.64%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0458.HK is 187.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0458.HK is 1915.06%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0458.HK is at 19.25%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative asset growth while 0458.HK invests at 9.41%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.

We have a declining book value while 0458.HK shows 4.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.

SG&A growth well above 0458.HK's 8.65%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.