PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-68.47%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-65.37%
Negative gross profit growth while 0458.HK is at 18.90%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.14%
Positive operating income growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
10.76%
Net income growth under 50% of 0458.HK's 48.16%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
7.69%
EPS growth under 50% of 0458.HK's 50.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
7.69%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0458.HK's 50.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 0458.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.88%
Positive OCF growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
49.71%
Positive FCF growth while 0458.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-97.45%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 35.95%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-96.44%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 108.87%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-90.02%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0458.HK stands at 130.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
115.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0458.HK's 134.64%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
-73.17%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0458.HK is at 124.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
185.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0458.HK's 16330.10%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-313.99%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0458.HK is at 270.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-501.36%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0458.HK is 188.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-1283.84%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0458.HK is 154.71%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-28.65%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-32.91%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-33.75%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0458.HK is at 10.44%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.56%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0458.HK shows 26.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-53.13%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-11.37%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-9.24%
We have a declining book value while 0458.HK shows 6.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-20.58%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-67.07%
Our R&D shrinks while 0458.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-20.36%
We cut SG&A while 0458.HK invests at 28.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.