PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-49.38%
Negative revenue growth while 0464.HK stands at 39.15%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-41.91%
Negative gross profit growth while 0464.HK is at 16.89%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-44.61%
Negative EBIT growth while 0464.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-44.57%
Negative operating income growth while 0464.HK is at 150.86%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-31.13%
Negative net income growth while 0464.HK stands at 188.05%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-32.88%
Negative EPS growth while 0464.HK is at 169.72%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-32.88%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0464.HK is at 169.72%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
2.69%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0464.HK's 6.38%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
2.69%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 0464.HK's 6.38%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.83%
Negative OCF growth while 0464.HK is at 42.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-181.77%
Negative FCF growth while 0464.HK is at 13.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-1.42%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 76.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-1.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 76.55%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-1.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 67.38%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-234.05%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 5.67%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-234.05%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK is at 5.67%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-234.05%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 711.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
34.13%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 13.50% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
34.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 13.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
34.13%
Below 50% of 0464.HK's 978.81%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.83%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.