PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Positive revenue growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
EBIT growth of 0.00% while 0464.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
-0.16%
Negative operating income growth while 0464.HK is at 5.12%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.23%
Net income growth under 50% of 0464.HK's 5.08%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.18%
EPS growth under 50% of 0464.HK's 5.10%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
2.18%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0464.HK's 5.10%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 39.43%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
97.16%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
97.16%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 4.57%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-368.11%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 23.51%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-368.11%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-368.11%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 19.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
168.86%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 19.28% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
168.86%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
168.86%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 6.91%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
We expand SG&A while 0464.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.