PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.56%
Revenue growth of 6.56% while 0464.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
14.43%
Gross profit growth of 14.43% while 0464.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
17.23%
EBIT growth of 17.23% while 0464.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
17.88%
Operating income growth of 17.88% while 0464.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
13.85%
Net income growth of 13.85% while 0464.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
-17.05%
Negative EPS growth while 0464.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-17.05%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0464.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
34.70%
Share change of 34.70% while 0464.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
34.70%
Diluted share change of 34.70% while 0464.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
475.46%
OCF growth of 475.46% while 0464.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
426.01%
FCF growth of 426.01% while 0464.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-22.02%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 39.43%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-22.02%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-22.02%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 4.57%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
273.65%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 23.51%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
273.65%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
273.65%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 19.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
13.62%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0464.HK's 19.28%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
13.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
13.62%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 6.91%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.22%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0464.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
7.40%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 0464.HK's 35.06%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-2.31%
Negative asset growth while 0464.HK invests at 11.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-18.91%
We have a declining book value while 0464.HK shows 6.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.55%
SG&A growth of 12.55% while 0464.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.